Who decides what research is funded, unethical, at odds with the purpose of the community etc? Initially the head of a department decides on research funding issues. If there is an ethical element to the research this should be carefully considered by all heads of the department. Followed by a public debate of randomly selected peers to resolve any disputes. Each grant can be requested once a year, if the researcher believes there is a bias on the part of the head of the department he can request a public dispute debate to formally demand the grant (if he wins the debate in the eyes of his peers.
Follow me on Twitter
Moving has proven to be a horror bastard, so I will rest the 100DaysOfCode to 1 when I am settled in the new place.
I'm not usually one to promote an author but you should all try out Andrew Vaillencourt's Fixer series. Great fun. Excellent #Cyberpunk #awesome
Driving Instructor: Okay, now just merge with the traffic.
Me: I can make the earth stop in its tracks. I made the blue cars go away. I can make myself invisible or small.